Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. The Galaxy A35 5G is a somewhat heavier device than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both are 0.32inches thick. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit more pixels per display inch and way more display brightness. The Galaxy A35 5G has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the OPPO Reno3 Pro, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior processor than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy A35 5G features greater battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.