Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 has a global score of 79.6, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A40 has 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Even though the Galaxy A40 is older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A40 features a bigger memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor, a lot higher resolution camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.