Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 75.8 score against 72. Even though Galaxy A5 (2017) is older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations and a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 34 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.