Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 83.8 against 72. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, and although the Galaxy A50 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A50 and OPPO Reno3 Pro count with incredibly similar batteries, although the Galaxy A50 has a 1% lower battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.