Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a score of 86.6 against 72. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Galaxy A50s is a just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, even when both of them were only released 5 months apart.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A50s's battery performance is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery performance, although the Galaxy A50s has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video, a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.