Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Samsung Galaxy A51 is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A51's CPU is very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a way bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy A51 and OPPO Reno3 Pro feature incredibly similar battery performance, although the Galaxy A51 has a 1 percent smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.