Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. Even being the best phone in this review, it must be told that it's also just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a processing unit that is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy A51 5G features much more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.