Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 90.7 score against 72. Galaxy A52's construction is newer than OPPO Reno3 Pro's, although it's just a bit thicker and a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52 features a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture, a back-facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the same video resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.