Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, but a little thicker and a little heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G feature quite similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bit higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Galaxy A52 5G have very similar cameras, both have the same video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture, a camera with a 64 mega-pixels, the same video definition and a same size back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.