Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52s is newer than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little higher screen pixel density.
Galaxy A52s features a camera that is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both have a 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture, a same size camera sensor and the same (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52s features a bit superior battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.