Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a score of 75.8 against 72. The Samsung Galaxy A6 design is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.