Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2017) is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 75.8 against 72. The Galaxy A7 (2017) is an a lot older and just a little bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit higher display pixel density and a little larger display. The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much higher video resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.