Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 76.9 score against 72. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A70 is older and just a little heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's body is still a bit thinner.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A70 has much more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.