Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Even though Galaxy A71 and the OPPO Reno3 Pro were released only 1 months apart, Galaxy A71's design is a bit heavier but also just a little thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per display inch.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A71 takes clearer photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have the same video frame rate, the same back-facing camera sensor size, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.