Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it must be told that it's also a a little heavier and a little thicker phone.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a little bit higher display density. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit longer battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures a little bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same camera sensor size, the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.