Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 (2018) is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a overall score of 79.2 against 72. The Galaxy A8 (2018) construction is just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A8 (2018) features a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution and a way better (4K) video quality. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.