Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A9 (2018) is older and a little heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s processing unit is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit better pixel number per display inch, a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite larger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.