Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C5 has a score of 76.4, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. The Galaxy C5 is an a lot older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Samsung made it lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy C5 has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a much higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.