Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C7 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a overall score of 77.7 against 72. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy C7 has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy C7 design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger display.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy C7, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a back camera with way more MP.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy C7, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.