Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C7 Pro is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 78.4 against 72. The Galaxy C7 Pro construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Reno3 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy C7 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a quite better pixels quantity per display inch, a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 22% larger battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a lot higher video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.