Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 72. The Galaxy F62 is a newer cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is heavier and thicker. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with way more brightness and a little higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a processor that is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's processing unit, although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has 2 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores. Galaxy F62 has a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 74% greater battery capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy F62. Both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with a 64 megapixels, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same sensor size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.