Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 97.6 score against 72. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and OPPO Reno3 Pro were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is thinner but also incredibly heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.