Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy J7 Max is a just a little heavier device than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both are equally thin.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy J7 Max's CPU is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy J7 Max has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features better battery duration than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.