Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy J8 is slightly better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 76.7 score against 72. The Galaxy J8 body has the same thickness than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a little heavier. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy J8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Galaxy J8, because it has a better screen pixel density, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite bigger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy J8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Galaxy J8 features just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy J8, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.