Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 78.9 score against 72. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Galaxy M20 is an older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. These phones include the same Android 10 OS. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a quite better count of pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a way better (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.