Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 82.4 score against 72. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance optimizations. Although Galaxy M30 is older and just a little thicker than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit lighter.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a better looking display than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M30 has better battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a much better video quality, a bigger aperture for better low light photography and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.