Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a global score of 87.7 against 72. Even being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy M51 is a somewhat thicker and heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 operating system.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Galaxy M51 feature very similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy M51 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy M51 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture, the same video resolution and a back facing camera with a 64 MP resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.