Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 72. Galaxy Note 20 is an a little bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy Note 20's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.