Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 72. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit smaller screen and a quite lower pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features much more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.