Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is way older and just a bit thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's construction is still just a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit higher pixels density and a bit bigger display.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.