Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is notably older than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is a little thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
Galaxy Note 5 has a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations and a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.