Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 80.4 against 72. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is an notably older phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Samsung could make it just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a processor that's just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's processor, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3200mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and a much higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.