Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 86.2 against 72. Although it's the best phone in this review, Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.