Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a 77.7 score against 72. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note3 is noticeably older and just a little thicker than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a quite larger display. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more processing cores (but slower) and 5 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a much better resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.