Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a global score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 body is noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 5 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger aperture, a lot larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.