Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a score of 83, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Despite being the best device in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a notably older, heavier and just a little thicker device. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 features a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.