Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting an 88.3 score against 72. The Galaxy S10 design is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released only 12 months before. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a way worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy S10 features just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.