Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 93.6 against 72. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a lot of extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it is heavier and was released only 10 months before.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a little worse display density, a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller display. Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.