Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a general score of 89.7 against 72. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a bit better count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.