Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 86.3 against 72. Galaxy S10e's construction is lighter and a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released only 12 months before. The Galaxy S10e counts with a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.