Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Galaxy S20 is a just a little thinner and a little lighter device than OPPO Reno3 Pro, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 has 13 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much worse pixels count per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much greater memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20's battery performance is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a 1% smaller battery size.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same back camera sensor size, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.