Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 72. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 FE is a just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.