Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and increased performance. Even being the best cellphone in this review, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than OPPO Reno3 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a bit smaller display and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much better video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features longer battery duration than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.