Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a 91.8 score against 72. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Galaxy S21 has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features and a performance increase. The Galaxy S21 is a newer device, and it's also just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also counts with a little more display brightness and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S21's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S21 features a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S21 have very similar battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy S21 has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution, a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and higher 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.