Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Galaxy S21 FE is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S21 FE has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have exactly the same internal memory.
The Galaxy S21 FE has just a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.