Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it is just a little thicker and a lot heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, more brightness and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both have equal internal memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 24% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.