Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 82.6 score against 72. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S25 body is much lighter and a lot thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. The Galaxy S25 features a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy S25's storage for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S25's battery performance is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's battery lifetime, although the Galaxy S25 has a 1 percent lower battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.