Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-03 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.17 ounces | -- |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a overall score of 90.7 against 72. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a notably thinner and way lighter cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little higher display density, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a much brighter screen.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better camera than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos, a way higher resolution back camera and a much better video quality. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.