Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 80.8 score against 72. The Samsung Galaxy S5 is a somewhat lighter device than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S5 has 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy S5 features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S5 has just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a 44 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.