Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a global score of 77.8 against 72. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S5 Sport is a much older and just a bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Samsung made it just a little lighter anyway.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Galaxy S5 Sport feature quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 44% larger battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way more megapixels back camera, a much bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.